A & Finet International Patent & Law Office Taiwan R.O.C.

The Taiwan Intellectual Property Court Ruled Unfavorably Against the Well-known Trademark “TATA”


Posted by: A & Finet International Patent & Law Office
Practice Area: Trademark    Country: Taiwan R.O.C.    Publish Date: 08-Sep-2009

The Indian TATA Group relied on its internationally famous trademark TATA and brought cancellation proceedings against TA TA Office Products, Inc., a Taiwanese company that has been successfully obtained the trademark registration TATA & Device with Chinese Characters in class 16.

The Court concluded the following points:

  1. Both parties trademarks should be considered similar since they contain the word TATA. Nevertheless, the trademark of the opposed party includes the device of an archway and a man figure, and that results in a decrease of similarities between both marks.
  2. The evidences provided by the opposing party can prove that the mark TATA is distinctive of their company reputations internationally. On the contrary, the evidences of the opposed party can prove their trademark famous among consumers and corporations in the relevant business field in Taiwan even before their filing date of the trademark application TATA & Device with Chinese Characters on March 10, 2006.
  3. Apart from the business involving information services for software, the opposing party cannot prove that the general consumers in Taiwan are aware of the existence of the their trademark for publications and provide with such evidences.
  4. Although the opposing party has obtained their foreign trademark registrations in class 16, they cannot further demonstrate the actual use of the mark. Moreover, there are no apparent business competitions between both parties since their products/services are diverse in relation to business chancels, locations, consumers, etc.
  5. The third party Tran Na Office Apparatus Co. Ltd obtained the Taiwanese trademark registration TATA & Chinese Characters since the year of 1987 and afterward assigned the rights to the opposed party TA TA Office Products, Inc in the year of 2002. Further to the fact that both marks have been coexisted for a long time, it will not cause confusions to the general consumers regarding these marks and their sources.
  6. There are several different prior trademark registrations bearing the English/Chinese letters TATA filed by others in different classes in Taiwan since 1974. Thus, a word trademark TATA cannot deem distinctive in Taiwan.

Accordingly, the Taiwan IP Court held that the existences of both marks TATA & Device with Chinese Characters and TATA are distinctive from each other and not likely to cause confusions to the general consumers with differences in trademark design, designated goods/services, business field, and sales connections. Moreover, the opposing trademark TATA and its international reputations are not yet well known among the Taiwanese consumers.

Organized and translated by Jenny Yu
International Affairs

A & Finet International Patent & Law Office
5F. - 3, No. 20, Sec. 3, Bade Rd., Taipei
10559, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
TEL: 886-2-2570-1010
FAX: 886-2-2570-1500/1532/1582
Website:
www.finetpat.com.tw
E-mail:
finetpat@ms26.hinet.net




Invite Friends/Associates to View this Newsletter
Your Name:
E-mail Address(es)
(one email per line):